Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Robin Haase vs Jesper De Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haase vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Robin Haase vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Haase 1 - 1 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haase has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 49.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haase, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 50.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haase has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haase has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Jong winning 58.62% (W/L 34/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haase has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 249/ 172), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 26/ 42). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Haase has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 20/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Haase winning 1 times and Jong being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Haase winning 2 and Jong winning 3. The last match between Haase and Jong was at the Alicante Challenger, 03-10-2022, First, Hard with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Haase and Jong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Haase winning 1 times and Jong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Haase winning 0, and Jong 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haase has played against opponents with an average rank of 503 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 317.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haase has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haase has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 47.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
757
Rank
33
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
176
Rank
135
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (532-436)
Career Total W/L
62% (225-136)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (21-14)
$3,068,890
Career Prize Money
$430,415
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Robin Haase | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 22 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:37 | 1:42:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (81/141) | 53% (80/152) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (57/81) | 70% (56/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (24/60) | 51% (37/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (6/17) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (59/152) | 43% (60/141) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Robin Haase
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
60 of
112)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Robin Haase | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (21/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (49/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (431/384) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (14/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 179 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 99 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 316.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1549/2639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1094/1549) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (544/1090) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (112/235) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (1014/2544) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 19% (16/3) |
Robin Haase Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Robin Haase
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Robin Haase
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
81%
(
22 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Robin Haase
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Benjamin Lock
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
14
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Robin Haase
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Robin Haase
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Robin Haase
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Robin Haase
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
13
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Haase Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
